CO129-178 - Governor Hennessy - 1877 [6-8] — Page 251

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

248

to me apart from any objection technical or otherwise to the legality of the conviction is whether it is shown to be a person the prisoner or not - who for the peace and good order of the colony it is desirable to remove.

With regard to the 1st Question, I think there can be no doubt that the evidence, if it is to be believed, justified the conviction, and under §7 of 1868 $28, might have been kept in penal servitude for 14 years, or imprisonment with hard labor for 2 years, solitary confinement, and if under 16, with a whipping.

The prisoner in the opinion of the Magistrate did not exceed the age of 16 years I presume, and I presume that he received the sentence of 2 floggings under §9 of 1867. §6.

"With regard to the 2nd Question from the transcript of the evidence before me I do not know that if I had been acting as Magistrate I should have convicted, but the Magistrate had the opportunity of hearing the evidence and better means of judging. The prisoner acted certainly suspiciously at least, and I have no doubt as to his guilt.

The remarks I made first as to his punishment in the case apply equally to this.

With regard to the 3rd Commission

Edit History

2026-05-21 17:18:51 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
248 to me apart from any objection technical or otherwise to the legality of the conviction is whether it is shown to be a person the prisoner or not - who for the peace and good order of the colony it is desirable to remove. With regard to the 1st Question, I think there can be no doubt that the evidence, if it is to be believed, justified the conviction, and under §7 of 1868 $28, might have been kept in penal servitude for 14 years, or imprisonment with hard labor for 2 years, solitary confinement, and if under 16, with a whipping. The prisoner in the opinion of the Magistrate did not exceed the age of 16 years I presume, and I presume that he received the sentence of 2 floggings under §9 of 1867. §6. "With regard to the 2nd Question from the transcript of the evidence before me I do not know that if I had been acting as Magistrate I should have convicted, but the Magistrate had the opportunity of hearing the evidence and better means of judging. The prisoner acted certainly suspiciously at least, and I have no doubt as to his guilt. The remarks I made first as to his punishment in the case apply equally to this. With regard to the 3rd Commission
Baseline (Original)
248 to me aport from any objection technical or otherwise to the legality of the enviction is whether is shown to be a perom the primer or not- who for the peas and good order of the lealmy it is desirable to remmes With regard to the 194 Couestion I think there ean the evidence, if it be no doubt that Who to be believed, justified the enviction, and undir 7 of 1868 $28, might have been Kept in penal sumitude for 14 дето imprisonment with hand labor for to 2 PV years, solitary emfinement, and if under 16, with a whipping. Ca The prismer in the opinion of the Magistrate did not excund the age of 16 year I presume, and Dale presume that he revived the sentence of 2 fleggings under 9 of 1867. § 6. | "With regard to the 2nd Cannidion from the traneipt of the widense before me I do not know that if 5 had been atting as Magistrate I chuld have envicted, but the Magis= brate had the opportunity of heming the evidence and better means of judging. The prismer acted certainly sis amal Suspicions least, and I have doubt go to his wamumew quill very to say the little moral The remarks -first- as to his punishment in the ease apply equally to this. استا With regard to the Fit Commistion
2026-05-21 17:18:51 · Baseline
View content

248

to me aport from any objection technical or otherwise to the legality

of the enviction is whether

is shown to be a perom

the primer

or not-

who for the peas and good order of the lealmy it is desirable to remmes

With regard to the 194 Couestion

I think there

ean

the evidence, if it

be no doubt that

Who

to be believed,

justified the enviction, and undir 7 of 1868 $28, might have been Kept in penal sumitude for 14

дето imprisonment with hand labor for

to

2

PV

years, solitary emfinement, and if under 16, with a whipping.

Ca

The prismer in the opinion of the Magistrate did not excund the

age of 16 year I presume, and Dale presume that he revived the sentence

of 2 fleggings under 9 of 1867. § 6.

|

"With regard to the 2nd Cannidion from the traneipt of the widense before me I do not know that if 5 had been atting as Magistrate I chuld have envicted, but the Magis= brate had the opportunity of heming the evidence and better means

of

judging. The prismer acted certainly sis

amal

Suspicions least, and I have

doubt go

to his

wamumew

quill

very

to say the little moral

The

remarks

-first-

as to his punishment in the

ease apply equally to this.

استا

With regard to the Fit Commistion

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.